Blog

Edu-punked: Is the Edupunk Movement Helping or Hurting the Educational Reformers Cause?


I finally rented, and watched, Waiting For Superman. I’m embarrassed to admit it took me so long to see it except for the fact that I was earning my Masters degree in teaching online in the MAT@USC program and therefore I was really busy when it came out in theaters and on DVD/Blu Ray. I received a free rental at my local Redbox and thought it was something interesting to watch on a Monday night. The good news is that I forgot to return it the next day so I ended up paying for it, although I don’t technically know if the filmmakers get paid for free rentals, or if late fees go to Redbox directly. To relieve my guilt I am buying a copy of the film on DVD, and a second on BluRay, and I am organizing a viewing party in my neighborhood. We will discuss what changes can be made to the educational system in order to improve the graduation rates in our community and to ensure that the children in our community receive a quality education, no matter which public school they attend.

In doing the research to find a place to hold the screening party and the people to invite to the party I’ve been talking to the people in my community. I’ve spoken to a couple of people from my church. I asked if I could use the church space for this event and I was asked to email one of the members of the Board of Trustees and then speak to our head Pastor. Not a firm no, but not the open arms of the community I was hoping to instantly receive. Then there is the “community” building at the front of my subdivision that I can rent any night of the week for a hefty fee plus a deposit. I was hoping not to come out of pocket for this event. Then there is the invite list. I can’t simply hold this event in my living room if I want my local State Representative and the Principals of the local public schools to attend my event. I really can’t even fit more that six people into my living room comfortably for a screening that will last 120 minutes and a discussion that will hopefully last just as long afterward.

Now I understand I think a little bigger than the filmmakers intended. They were thinking more along the lines of getting a few of my friends together to watch the movie and make small talk about it over some smoked Gouda and a fine wine. I fail to see how this kind of action would effect any change in my community. How would this approach help me to better understand other points of view, or hear from my public officials or the administrators of our public schools? How would watching a movie in my living room and simply talking about it do any good other than to make me feel better about a very difficult problem facing my country?

By now you’re wondering how this has anything to do with the Edupunk Movement. Well here’s the link: what do I want out of public education that I am not currently receiving? The Edupunk Movement is attempting to ask this question about K-12 and beyond. It is daring to take matters into it’s own hands and attempt to educate people for free and ask people to actually go out and do things with their knowledge rather than talk conceptually about it. This is also Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural learning theory, but we’ll leave that for a future blog.

So that’s when I realized that what I am attempting to do by organizing a rather large and ambitious screening party of Waiting For Superman is in fact an act of Edupunking the education system. I’m going to ask those in power and those who are served by public education to clearly define their goals for education. I will not be satisfied with overly simplified answers such as: “We want our children to receive a “good” education,” or “We want our kids to be able to get “good” jobs after they graduate,” or my personal favorite, “We want every student to go to college after they graduate high school.”

I was reading a fantastic blog called “Half An Hour: A place to write, half an hour, every day, just for me,” written by a man named Downes about a review of The Edupunks’ Guide, by Anya Kamenetz and a lightbulb went off inside my head. Education is not preparing students to do anything in the real world. This erroneous education of American youth must stop if we’re going to go somewhere new. We are all experts within our own lives. We know what we know about what we know when and how we need or want to know it. So what makes people believe that school is any different? What exactly are we asking children to “know” these days and what will they be doing with all of this “knowledge” after they leave school?

I wrote a blog last month about the value of a Liberal Arts degree. Now I’m asking, “What was the value of my high school, middle school and elementary education and how does all of my school learning compare to my education in the working world after leaving school?” What did I learn and how did I learn it?

The concept behind Edupunk is to deconstruct learning, teaching and education then empower the students to re-construct it in their own way, through their own filter system by actually doing things within that discipline with the help of mentors. This sounds exactly like the education I received from the MAT@USC, the most effective learning I’ve ever experienced.

My cohort embarked on a new way of learning, through a new online platform and with the help of “more learned adults” we muddled our way through experiential and experimental learning whereby we tested the theories we were reading about in class. Dr. Sylvester, the head of Spring ISD’s Human Resources department said it best when he said, “You’re going to close your books, walk into a real classroom and those theories are going to grow legs, walk around and throw things if you don’t know what you’re doing.”

I’m willing to take this theory one step further. In life, if you attempt to do anything without knowing how to do it, you’re going to fail. What you do after you fail determines your overall success. If you choose to ask for help, find experts to mentor you, pay for classes, do extensive research, practice until you approach perfection and give yourself several thousand chances to do it right, you’re going to succeed. If you look for a “quick-fix” you’ll find one and then you will fail to get what you really wanted in the first place: to become something you set out to become (Downes). This is the best message of the whole review of the Edupunk Guide. Only through supported effort can we accomplish our goals, but first we have to know what our goals are.

Therefore, I will be setting some very clear goals for what I want out of my upcoming town hall screening party. I will also require my guests to clarify their goals for reforming education before we grab the pitchforks and torches and take to the street. My community might be surprised to realize that we all want the same thing, to feel like we matter, our voices are heard and our actions count, no matter who we are, or which school we attended. If America hopes to reform education, then we all have to be a part of knowing what kind of change we want and why we want it. The why may be the most important part of our answer. The most powerful motivation a person can have is a great reason why they want to do something, everything after that is simply something they have to do to get what they want.

As for me, I want to make sure Mother Theresa and Ghandi are honored everyday. Mother Theresa once gave the advice to find someone who has no hope and convince that person they have a reason to live. And Ghandi suggested that we become the change we want to see in the world. I’ll get back to you on the details of how a person can live by these guiding principals in the real world. In the meantime, it’s just nice to know I have some.

Other Posts

  • Katie Peters

    I am entering my second semester with USC and everyone keeps telling me to watch this. I will now make a point to watch it before my semester starts! Thanks

  • Kmar

    The movie has been out since 2010. I always wondered why none of my education or credential professors ever assigned the documentary as an assignment. Too complex or discouraging for a educator in training? Anyways, I watched it but was not able to speak to anyone about it because none of my colleagues at the school I was student teaching or in class had seen it. So I thought your idea to plan a screening was a great strategy. However I am sorry for your set back. If you have more time, Waiting for Superman the publication [edited by Karl Weber] hosts some form of discussion and deeper insight to what the documentary wanted their viewers to see. 

  • http://www.iarumac.com/wordpress Heather MacCorkle Edick

    Great post, Erin!  I see the passion you have for reforming – or reconstructing might be a better word – education.  Keep up the good work.

  • http://www.facebook.com/whitneyhannaford Whitney Hunter

    Like Katie, I too, haven’t watched it but I have heard about it. I was in Korea when it came out and couldn’t find a place to stream it. Definitely on my “to-do” list before September session begins. Thank you Erin!

  • Mark

    Erin, 
         As I read it, I believe your note distills down to a passionate and sincere desire to help others, one soul at a time.  I laud, and share, that.  Good for you!
         As you are to be a future leader and expert in education, however, I suggest you hold off on gathering lawmakers and other decision makers until you are prepared to show them the path forward – not vice versa –  to success.  Educators seem to like criticizing the status quo but I’m finding their leadership all but invisible.  I can hear their complaining, I just don’t see their leadership.
         I’m also a student in the  MAT@USC and while only one semester into it, I’d have to say the program fits into your description offered of those who would ‘offer overly simplistic answers’, if there are any answers there at all. 
         Count me with those who believe all education is 1:1 and the heat and fury complaining and theorizing is only time diverted from individuals who make a real difference.  You will make a difference.
         Thanks,
    mark

  • Jessica McCarthy

    Great post!! I think we just discussed this movie recently.  Having a sister who is also an educator, it’s definitely clear that the concern is definitely not about the children or even the good teachers, but the adults and the administrators.  More and more, I hear about how the administrative side of salaries, personnel, etc. are bypassing those of actual educators.  I think you have a strong point of view and will be able to motivate others to action, but I agree with Mark, that sometimes you have to find the solution rather than just reminding lawmakers about the problems, another task I think you are totally capable of.  =)  In the words of Margaret Mead “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” 

  • Karl Smith

    Sorry, I don’t buy it.  In my classroom, in the MAT program, when I present PD to other teachers, when I participate in curriculum development, I use everything I ever learned (not literally, but in essence).  I can understand what I’m reading in a journal article, and write a cogent response, because I had a sequence of teachers who exposed me to good models, “deconstructed” them, and had me construct my own in my ZPD.  I used the critical thinking skills I was taught to critique “Waiting for Superman” as an agenda-driven attack on organized teachers  What we need to do is not reframe the whole building, just increase the focus on how to build relevance and practical connections.  None of what we currently teach needs to be wasted.  (For example, I know why Bachman’s John Quincy Adams mistake matters because I learned American History. (“Why do we need to know this????”  “So when some demagogue tries to pull the wool over your eyes, you can call them on it.”)  If we want students to make connections, we have to show them how to do.
    As a side note, I had a “small meeting in my living room” so that friends and interested neighbors could meet a mayoral candidate who wasn’t part of the “old-boys” network that has ruled politics in my city for 60 years.  She’s now in her second term. 

  • Karl Smith

    Mark, I agree.  In the nearly 20 years I’ve been in education, the most consistent flaw in policy has been that the profession is always in reactive mode.  We are always flailing about, trying to “fix” the latest crisis, generally with poorly thought-out and unsatisfactory solutions.  It’s all well and good to blame the politicians for poor policy (and it is they who generate much of it), but our mistake is that we are always behind the curve, not ahead of it.  We spend our time trying to patch the Titanic, when what we should have done was plot a slightly different course, and not worry about the speed record.  The critical need is for forward planners who can also make their voices heard.  We need long-term planning that will make the foes of public education as a social equalizer look like the class-war bigots they truly are.

  • Mark

    “it”???  What is the “it” you’re not wanting to buy?

    Perhaps too much time in American History and not enough in English grammar and composition, methinks.